This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Revision 2006...
#17
@gid: Yeah... I suspected it had something to do with that. It was the only absolute change I introduced. Unfortunately, I had to means to test it in other system. Sad
Thanks for removing that and for providing more fixes for the shaders under AMD. Great job! Big Grin

@andutrache:
1.- Smile
2.- I decided not to allow saving this in the Settings.properties right in r2006 because I was afraid it could be an unstable feature. Turns out I was right, but for the wrong cause. Tongue
Saving the filter status and the selected resolution should be easy to add. Wink
3.- Yes, this is normal. The only resolutions that should not corrupt the graphical display are the native ones 480x272, 960x544 and 1440x816. The others need a more complex rescaling, so they're still a TODO feature.
4.- Big Grin
5.- Any improvements with dynamic shader generation?
6.- Hmm... Could you send me some screenshots, with any test application running, demonstrating the resizing?
7.- This may be also normal. Full screen still needs more improvements, like the removal of the window's decorations before the full maximization. Unfortunately, Java makes this a quite hard task because it envolves disposing the current window, setting it's undecorated parameter to true and then build the window again. I'm currently looking for better ways to implement a workaround for this.

@Vegerunks: Are you still experiencing low FPS after gid's fixes in r2014?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Revision 2006... - by Vegerunks - 03-08-2011, 01:04 AM
RE: Revision 2006... - by tr4nquility - 03-08-2011, 11:10 AM
RE: Revision 2006... - by BlackDaemon - 03-08-2011, 11:49 AM
RE: Revision 2006... - by andutrache - 03-08-2011, 01:09 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Hykem - 03-08-2011, 09:08 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by gid15 - 03-09-2011, 08:39 AM
RE: Revision 2006... - by gid15 - 03-09-2011, 08:43 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Vegerunks - 03-08-2011, 09:28 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Hykem - 03-08-2011, 09:38 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Vegerunks - 03-08-2011, 09:39 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Hykem - 03-08-2011, 09:48 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Vegerunks - 03-08-2011, 09:51 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by andutrache - 03-08-2011, 09:54 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by MaXiMu - 03-08-2011, 10:34 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by dista_bagus - 03-09-2011, 06:00 AM
RE: Revision 2006... - by andutrache - 03-09-2011, 10:59 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Hykem - 03-11-2011, 11:12 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Kai3213 - 03-11-2011, 11:41 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Vegerunks - 03-12-2011, 08:39 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by andutrache - 03-12-2011, 03:35 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Hykem - 03-12-2011, 10:08 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by hyperspeedgx - 03-13-2011, 01:32 AM
RE: Revision 2006... - by hyperspeedgx - 03-13-2011, 03:08 AM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Hykem - 03-13-2011, 04:08 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by hyperspeedgx - 03-14-2011, 12:39 AM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Aredo - 03-13-2011, 05:02 PM
RE: Revision 2006... - by Hykem - 03-13-2011, 05:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)