EmuNewz Network
Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII - ULUS10336 - Printable Version

+- EmuNewz Network (https://www.emunewz.net/forum)
+-- Forum: PSP Emulation (https://www.emunewz.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=191)
+--- Forum: JPCSP Official Forum (https://www.emunewz.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+---- Forum: Commercial Game Discussion (https://www.emunewz.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=54)
+----- Forum: JPCSP - Playable Games (https://www.emunewz.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=65)
+----- Thread: Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII - ULUS10336 (/showthread.php?tid=976)



RE: CRISIS CORE:FINAL FANTASY VII - ULUS10336 - The_Unknown - 08-05-2012

Heyho,

I set the configuration in the first posting (both of them, because I run an ATI machine), but I still have only 21fps when fighting the first battle in the game with the tons of soldiers.

My machine:

Core i5 750 @ Stock
4 GB DDR3
Radeon HD 7870

Is there any way to get that working with playable frame rates? Or is it my machine (I'm getting a 4,2 GHz Ivy Bridge and 8 GB RAM next week btw.)?


RE: CRISIS CORE:FINAL FANTASY VII - ULUS10336 - serio - 08-05-2012

make sure you also get a good nvidia geforce graphic card with your new pc.

the radeon compatibility hacks/broken opengl support probably adds to the slowdown, though i guess having a 4 core cpu also doesn't help either since i don't think java can use more than 2, if even that.


RE: CRISIS CORE:FINAL FANTASY VII - ULUS10336 - The_Unknown - 08-05-2012

As you see, my Radeon-card's is quite new (1 month or so). I'm not planning to change that. Don't you think it's possible to run the game smooth with the following system (which I have next week):

Intel Core i5-3570K @ 4,2 GHz
8GB RAM
Radeon HD 7870

The guy here seems to do it though: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcFI102zt9E



RE: CRISIS CORE:FINAL FANTASY VII - ULUS10336 - serio - 08-05-2012

maybe it's the catalyst drivers' fault then. i dunno what version he uses and which one you have though, so dunno.

other than that, i'm not really sure, since my system specs aren't anywhere near yours or his.


RE: CRISIS CORE:FINAL FANTASY VII - ULUS10336 - hyakki - 08-05-2012

He listed the options he used under his video post, (although I dont know why he used stencil test and color mask, since they usually bring a slow down esp on bigger window size, who knows maybe they help ati. or perhaps even that guy really has a nvidia card saying he has an ati just for hits.)

anyways I guess start with his config settings, but like serio said some ati drivers work better then others, I'm also not sure what ones.


RE: CRISIS CORE:FINAL FANTASY VII - ULUS10336 - ShadyNinjaStick24 - 08-16-2012

um how do you play the sound and videos on the jcpsp ? i need help D;


RE: CRISIS CORE:FINAL FANTASY VII - ULUS10336 - Zekro - 08-16-2012

Enable media engine and install and enable sonicstage


RE: CRISIS COFINAL FANTASY VII - ULUS10336 - abood555 - 08-27-2012

(08-05-2012, 04:50 PM)The_Unknown Wrote: As you see, my Radeon-card's is quite new (1 month or so). I'm not planning to change that. Don't you think it's possible to run the game smooth with the following system (which I have next week):

Intel Core i5-3570K @ 4,2 GHz
8GB RAM
Radeon HD 7870

The guy here seems to do it though: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcFI102zt9E


hmm... i doubt his video is legit :P


RE: CRISIS CORE:FINAL FANTASY VII - ULUS10336 - Zantetsuken - 09-03-2012

Hi guys. I'm following the instructions in this thread, to great success. The game runs almost perfectly, 100% speed most of the time.

However, I get black boxes around some numbers on the screen. Is there any way to fix that? Thanks a lot for your hard work.

[Image: ClCyn.jpg]


RE: CRISIS CORE:FINAL FANTASY VII - ULUS10336 - hyakki - 09-03-2012

(09-03-2012, 11:03 PM)Zantetsuken Wrote: Hi guys. I'm following the instructions in this thread, to great success. The game runs almost perfectly, 100% speed most of the time.

However, I get black boxes around some numbers on the screen. Is there any way to fix that? Thanks a lot for your hard work.

Set the 'maximum method size' to a higher value then 50, - 100 or 500 should be good though there may be a slight (maybe unnoticeable) performance loss.