This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941]
#17
(02-26-2015, 10:27 PM)emunewzdecade Wrote: Parallel compilation would be interesting for the different versions of OpenGL 3.3 and OpenGL 3.3+, as the PS2 emulator plugins. Recalling that was possible in previous versions of rpcs3 interpret VP and FP images with OpenGL 3.3, since the hardware of the Playstation 3 is based on NVIDIA G70 thus may not require as current video hardware.

"... thus may not require as current video hardware."

We probably wont have hardware that will run PS3 games OK for another 5 years.
By the time we'll run most PS3, everybody will probably running OpenGL 6 or "OpenGL Next". And considering that OpenGL 4.2 is already quite old - it was released on August 8, 2011. Also often newer version of OpenGL have some new features that we can use to emulate something that was on PS3. Why we moved to OpenGL 4.2 is because it has some new instructions for the Shader Program, which were on PS3 and used by many games. Without those additions that were made in OpenGL 4.2 the developers would spend more time working on custom implementations of these instructions, when they could be working on more important stuff like trying to reverse engineer RSX.

TL;DR: Doing some things in OpenGL 4.2 is easier, takes less time and isn't worth of a custom implementation for older hardware, which most likely wont run any good games anyway.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by emunewzdecade - 02-23-2014, 06:24 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by ssshadow - 02-23-2014, 06:29 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by tambre - 02-25-2015, 05:25 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by ssshadow - 02-25-2015, 05:44 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by Gundark - 02-26-2015, 11:35 AM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by tambre - 02-26-2015, 02:50 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by Ru4slan - 02-26-2015, 03:42 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by tambre - 02-26-2015, 03:45 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by Ru4slan - 02-26-2015, 05:34 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by tambre - 02-26-2015, 06:53 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by Gundark - 02-26-2015, 06:43 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by Ru4slan - 02-27-2015, 05:30 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by tambre - 02-27-2015, 01:54 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by BlackDaemon - 10-19-2015, 11:34 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by BlackDaemon - 01-05-2016, 01:54 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by aakh1361 - 03-22-2017, 11:16 PM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by flash-fire - 07-25-2017, 12:42 AM
RE: Battle vs. Chess [BLES00941] - by Annie - 07-28-2017, 04:45 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)